"Viper. I like Boa constrictor, too. But viper is the best meat I've ever had. It tastes like fish and chicken combined. It's very good." - Luc Mbah A Moute, when asked to name his favourite food.

 
.
 
6  -  Ben Wallace - C, 6'9, 240
Free agent - Last played with Detroit (2012)
       Date of birth: 09/10/1974
       Country: USA
     Drafted (NBA): Undrafted, 1996
     Out of: Virginia Union
  NBA Experience: 16 years
  Hand: Right
 Agent: Arn Tellem (Wasserman Media Group)

So you know that Ben Wallace is a 4 time defensive player of the year, and you know he's the worst free throw shooter in the history of this particular solar system. Those are both pretty well documented.

Here's some stuff that you have to dig for, though.

1) Ben Wallace is a good ballhandler for a centre.
2) Ben Wallace is a good passer of the ball, particularly for a centre.
3) Ben Wallace's jumpshot is poor, but not horrid. He can occasionally make open ones.
4) You've never seen anyone worse at layups in your life. Not even me.

Any layup, hook shot, or even a one handed dunk, is an adventure. And it's an adventure that often ends badly. For whatever reason - allegedly due to a missing tendon in his shooting hand - Wallace can't make these simple shots.. This tendon-induced complete-inability-to-hit-layups doesn't seem to stop him screaming "AND ONE!" every time he chucks one over the backboard, and nor does it explain why he hasn't worked on develop his non-tendon-deficient left hand instead. (Maybe he's stubborn. His history of falling out with coaches and sulking when he doesn't get to wear his headband would also suggest this.) By this time, however, these things are too late to change. Offensively, even with his dribbling and passing, Ben Wallace is awful.

Nonetheless, those DPOY's are there for a reason. For those still unaware of how Ben Wallace plays, here's a short recap. At about 6'7 tall in spite of what it says on your left, Wallace went undrafted and unappreciated as a young player because everybody tried to play him as a small forward, where his complete inability to hit a shot became a major drawback. As he bulked up more, he emerged as a small centre who used all his strength and supreme athleticism to win both rebounding titles and Defensive Player Of The Year awards, even if his offensive game was limited to Rip Hamilton's lob passes. Wallace's help defense was terrific, his man defense good, his rebounding elite, and his tenacity unmatched.

But now, his athleticism is starting to wane, and he's getting injured more often. He can't defend both the protagonists of a pick and roll at once any more, but still plays like he can, and his style of play hasn't changed even now that his agility has declined. He will still rebound and defend well, but not as well as he could. With there now being exposable holes in his defense, Ben is more and more having to rely on his skill to survive on the court.

And that's......a pity.


- 5th March, 2009.





From blog:


   How much centres get paid
2010-10-04

- Detroit: Ben Wallace (2 years, $4,326,400), Jason Maxiell (4 years, $20 million), Chris Wilcox (2 years, $6 million)

[read full post]

   Creative Financing in the NBA, 2010
2010-08-12

Only two teams this summer have used their Bi-Annual Exceptions so far. Milwaukee used theirs on ShamSports.com favourite Keyon Dooling, while Detroit used theirs to re-sign Ben Wallace (whose lack of effort during his time with the Bulls has permanently sullied any affection I once had for him). However, while Milwaukee used their BAE because they'd spent their MLE on Drew Gooden, Detroit used their BAE while their MLE sits there untouched. That MLE is probably going to stay untouched all summer, because they've certainly shown no inclination to use it thus far, and http://www.shamsports.com/2010/07/the-best-of-what-left.htmlall the MLE calibre free agents have gone. They could have used it on Wallace so that they could carry over their BAE; they should have used it on Wallace so that they could carry over their BAE. But they didn't.

As was the case with Washington, this might turn out to be completely insignificant. But what if it isn't? What was the point of that?

[read full post]

   Chicago's Meticulously Crafted 2011 Offseason Plan That Relies An Awful Lot Upon Guesswork
2011-06-09

Stage 2: Getting rid of the No-Headband Rule.



It's time.

The no-headband rule was instituted by John Paxson circa 2004, after Bulls bench player Eddie Robinson was repeatedly seen in practice wearing his headband around his neck. To Paxson, this presented an unnecessary choke hazard, and when Robinson petulantly refused to do anything about it, Paxson felt he had to ban headbands altogether, for that was the only way to get Robinson to stop.

The rule wasn't a big deal until Ben Wallace, upping the petulance stakes a little, made it so. Wallace snuck a headband onto the court for the start of an otherwise forgettable regular season game, and when Scott Skiles noticed this, he had little choice but to bench him. Wallace was put back into the starting lineup for the second half of the same game, yet again he had smuggled out a headband, and took the court wearing it. Once again, he was benched, and the scandal of Headbandgate ensued.29 It was a completely unnecessary blight upon the franchise brought about by players being children, and the hierarchy - whose hands were tied - were made to look ridiculous purely for enforcing rules they didn't want to have even created. It was a bad time.

The particularly galling part of it all is that, while Ben Wallace has long been synonymous with wearing a headband, particularly when he had his big fro, there have been many, many, many, many games in which he has not worn one, by choice. It does not take much Googling to find pictures that evidence this. Here's one. Here's another. Et cetera. Ben needlessly brought up, broke, and eventually won an exception to, a rule that was not a particularly big deal to anyone, not even to him.

[read full post]


Free Agents








Note: Non-US teams that the player has played for are, unless stated otherwise, from the top division in that nation. If league or division name is expressly stated, it's not the top division. The only exceptions to this are the rare occasions where no one league is said to be above the other, such as with the JBL/BJ League split inJapan.

In the event where more than one agent is listed, this is because the player has more than one agent. This is rather commonplace - a lot of times, a player will sign with a big agency, and they will have both primary and secondary agents from within that agency to handle their affairs. (Where that happens, the primary agent is listed first.) Also, foreign players tend to have both American and domestic agents. Where the details of such are known, they are listed.


Follow this site on: